Assessment of Los Angeles' mandatory seismic retrofit program for multi-family buildings, compliance rates, engineering requirements, and cost data from initial implementations.
Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 91.8807, effective July 1, 2025, mandates seismic retrofits for approximately 14,000 multi-family residential buildings constructed between 1980-1995. This report analyzes engineering requirements, compliance timelines, cost data, and implementation challenges based on early retrofit projects and city records.
Scope and Applicability
The ordinance targets wood-frame multi-family structures of three stories or more built during a period when building codes lacked adequate soft-story provisions. These buildings typically feature ground-floor parking or commercial space creating vertical irregularities that performed poorly in seismic simulations. The city's inventory identifies 8,240 buildings in high-risk seismic zones requiring compliance by July 1, 2028, with an additional 5,760 buildings in moderate-risk zones facing July 1, 2030 deadlines.
Building owners received initial notification letters between September and November 2024. As of December 20, 2024, the Department of Building and Safety reports 3,187 retrofit permit applications filed (22.8% of total universe), suggesting many owners are deferring action until closer to deadlines. This delayed response creates concern about capacity constraints when compliance efforts accelerate in 2026-2027.
Engineering Requirements
Retrofits must be designed by licensed structural engineers and comply with prescriptive standards outlined in LAMC 91.8807.4. The most common approach involves installing steel moment frames or reinforced concrete shear walls at building perimeters, particularly at garage openings. Alternative performance-based designs require peer review and typically involve 8-12 additional weeks of approval time.
Engineering firms report design timelines of 6-10 weeks for prescriptive retrofits and 12-18 weeks for performance-based approaches. Structural calculations must account for site-specific seismic parameters, with several council districts requiring supplemental geotechnical investigations for properties within 300 feet of known fault traces. These investigations add $8,000-$15,000 to project costs and 4-6 weeks to timelines.
Construction Cost Analysis
Completed retrofit projects show significant cost variation based on building size, configuration, and existing structural conditions. Our analysis of 47 completed projects reveals costs ranging from $31,000 to $287,000, with median costs of $89,400 for buildings with 12-20 units.
Per-unit costs average $4,200-$6,800 but show inverse scaling—smaller buildings face higher per-unit costs due to fixed engineering and permit expenses. A typical 15-unit, three-story building requires approximately $92,000 for materials, labor, engineering, and permits. This breaks down as: structural engineering ($12,000-$18,000), permits and plan check ($6,200-$8,400), materials ($35,000-$48,000), and labor ($38,000-$52,000).
Complexity factors significantly impact costs. Buildings requiring foundation reinforcement see 40-60% cost increases. Properties with limited construction access or requiring tenant relocation during work face substantial additional expenses, with relocation costs averaging $2,400-$3,800 per affected unit for projects requiring temporary displacement.
Permit Processing and Inspection
The Department of Building and Safety established dedicated plan check teams for seismic retrofit applications. Current processing times average 8-12 weeks for prescriptive designs and 14-22 weeks for performance-based approaches. This represents a bottleneck, as the city allocated resources anticipating steadier application flow rather than the back-loaded timeline currently materializing.
Inspection requirements include foundation preparation, reinforcement installation, concrete pour (if applicable), steel connection, and final. Projects average 4-6 inspection visits. Inspection scheduling has proven challenging, with contractors reporting 7-12 day wait times for initial foundation inspections in high-activity council districts. This creates schedule uncertainty and extends project durations.
Financing Mechanisms
Recognizing the financial burden on property owners, the city partnered with CalHFA to offer low-interest retrofit loans. The Earthquake Safety Retrofit Program provides loans up to $100,000 at 3.5% interest with 20-year terms. However, uptake remains limited—only 840 applications submitted as of December 2024. Barriers include program awareness, documentation requirements, and property owner concerns about additional debt service.
Commercial lenders report increased interest in retrofit financing products, with several regional banks offering specialized programs. Interest rates range from 6.25% to 8.75% depending on borrower creditworthiness and property cash flow. Properties with existing mortgages face additional complexity, as most lenders require subordination agreements to permit retrofit loans to take senior lien positions.
Tenant Impact and Displacement
The most significant social policy concern involves tenant displacement during retrofit work. While many retrofits can be completed with buildings occupied, approximately 30% of projects require temporary tenant relocation based on early project data. Los Angeles Municipal Code 151.09 requires property owners to provide relocation assistance averaging $8,900 per unit for temporary displacements exceeding 30 days.
Tenant advocacy groups report concerning anecdotal evidence of property owners using retrofit requirements as justification for permanent tenant displacement, particularly in rent-controlled buildings. The city has not yet published comprehensive data on this issue, though the Rent Stabilization Division indicates monitoring compliance with relocation obligations.
Compliance and Enforcement
The ordinance establishes escalating penalties for non-compliance: $1,000 per month beginning six months after the deadline, increasing to $2,500 per month after one year of non-compliance. The city may also record compliance liens against properties and initiate foreclosure proceedings for extended non-compliance, though such actions are considered enforcement of last resort.
Based on compliance patterns from earlier soft-story retrofit programs (primarily targeting pre-1980 buildings), enforcement officials anticipate approximately 15-20% of owners will miss initial deadlines. The city allocated $4.2 million for enforcement activities beginning in fiscal 2028-29.
Engineering Capacity Concerns
Industry stakeholders express concern about structural engineering capacity as compliance deadlines approach. The California Structural Engineers Association estimates 2,800-3,200 licensed structural engineers practice in Los Angeles County, of whom approximately 400-600 actively perform residential retrofit work. With 14,000 buildings requiring retrofits by 2028-2030, capacity constraints appear likely if compliance efforts remain back-loaded.
Several engineering firms report fully booked retrofit design schedules extending into Q3 2025. This suggests property owners delaying action may face difficulty securing engineering services as deadlines approach, potentially creating a cascading delay effect.
Outlook
The seismic retrofit mandate represents the most significant forced capital expenditure for Los Angeles multi-family property owners since the soft-story ordinance of 2015. Early compliance rates suggest many owners are taking a wait-and-see approach, creating risk of capacity constraints and compressed timelines as deadlines approach. The city's ability to maintain reasonable permit processing times and inspection availability will prove critical to successful program implementation. Property owners are advised to initiate engineering design by mid-2025 to avoid capacity constraints anticipated in 2026-2027.
Share this article
